Photo Manipulation and Ethics

Time Staff Brian Walski was fired for manipulating good original photos with good content, the reason why was because when he took the photo a missile failed to launch, so he used the cloning effect and cloned one of the missiles, Adnan Hajj manipulated another photo from a buiilding to  make it darker with ore smoke, after an airstrike, from the buildings in Suburban Beirut.
Issam Kobeisi, used the same cloning effect three times with the same women, in different photos, without the name of the women all three times.

I think its Acceptable because if you trying to make a perfect photo for a paper, or your job its acceptable because your fixing the mistake that YOU made in the photo and if the brightness is to dak or to high you can fix it.

I think this is the most unethical, because everybody seem to be looking to the left and some to the right, they didn't need to add another person to the photo that are looking the same way with the main two people in the photo but more happy, and energetic, because he doesn't fit because his expression of smile seems to be more excited for something else.

I think this is the most ethical because this is what the ''Daily News'' wants to make them look like they're debating on what the people want them to debate about, which they were not, because Bush seems to not be focused on what Saddam is talking about.